Competition and Predation as Mechanisms for Displacement of Greenback Cutthroat Trout by Brook Trout

نویسنده

  • C. C. MCGRATH
چکیده

—Cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkii frequently are displaced by nonnative brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis, but the ecological mechanisms of displacement are not understood. Competition for food and predation between greenback cutthroat trout O. c. stomias and brook trout were investigated in montane streams of Colorado. A replicated field study was used to describe the population density, diet, stomach fullness, and body condition of the two species in allopatry and sympatry. Population data confirmed that brook trout displaced greenback cutthroat trout at sites where the species occur together. The diets of the two species were different; cutthroat trout consumed more prey items and a wider variety of prey than brook trout. Sympatry did not influence gut fullness or body condition for either species. Predation occurred at low rates that did not account for declines in populations of greenback cutthroat trout. Instead, population data suggest that the displacement of greenback cutthroat trout by brook trout occurs through a bottleneck on recruitment due to the mortality of eggs or juvenile cutthroat trout. The greenback cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkii stomias, which is endemic to the South Platte and Arkansas rivers, is listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Like many subspecies of cutthroat trout O. clarkii, greenback cutthroat trout declined in abundance during the late 1800s and early 1900s because of harvest, habitat alteration, and introduction of nonnative salmonids (Behnke 2002). Only 18 populations are known to have survived. Recovery efforts initiated in the 1970s have focused on identification of suitable habitat, removal of nonnative salmonids from restoration areas by means of antimycin, and stocking of hatchery-reared greenback cutthroat trout to establish self-sustaining populations. Restoration sites typically are headwater streams and lakes that are isolated from nonnative fishes by barriers, such as waterfalls or dams. As of 2005, about 60 such sites contained greenback cutthroat trout, but many of these populations are not considered to be stable because of small population size, lack of reproduction, or the presence of nonnative salmonids (USFWS 1998; Young and Harig 2001; Young et al. 2002). Efforts to restore greenback cutthroat trout have been hindered by the presence of nonnative salmonids, including rainbow trout O. mykiss, Yellowstone cutthroat trout O. c. bouvieri, brown trout Salmo trutta and, most frequently, brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis. Brook trout occur at about 25% of greenback cutthroat trout sites as a result of incomplete eradication, migration upstream past ineffective barriers, or reintroduction by anglers (Trotter 1987; Young 1995; USFWS 1998; Young et al. 2002). Greenback cutthroat trout and brook trout have similar habitat requirements, and both species are sensitive to habitat disturbance (Behnke 2002). Both species feed on a variety of aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates and may sometimes eat small fish or amphibians (Bulkley 1959; Cummings 1987; Young and Harig 2001). Greenback cutthroat trout spawn in late spring or early summer and fry emerge in August, while brook trout spawn in the fall and fry emerge in early summer. Typically, greenback cutthroat trout spawn at age 3 and older and brook trout at age 2 and older (USFWS 1998; Behnke 2002). The mechanisms of displacement of native fishes by introduced species include hybridization, disease transmission, competition, and predation. Fall-spawning brook trout do not hybridize with greenback cutthroat trout, although rainbow trout and other cutthroat trout subspecies readily hybridize with greenback cutthroat trout (Allendorf et al. 2001). Disease transmission from brook trout does not account for declines in greenback cutthroat trout (USFWS, unpublished data) or the closely related Colorado River cutthroat trout (O. c. pleuriticus; Peterson and Fausch 2002). Competition and predation both are plausible mechanisms for displacement of cutthroat trout by brook trout. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 Present address: U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 322 East Front Street, Suite 401, Boise, Idaho 83702, USA. Received January 18, 2007; accepted May 11, 2007 Published online August 30, 2007 1381 Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:1381–1392, 2007 Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2007 DOI: 10.1577/T07-017.1 [Article]

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Influence of Habitat Type on Food Supply, Selectivity, and Diet Overlap of Bonneville Cutthroat Trout and Nonnative Brook Trout in Beaver Creek, Idaho

—We collected invertebrate drift samples and stomach contents of native Bonneville cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki utah and nonnative brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis in Beaver Creek, Idaho, during August 1995 to assess food availability and the potential for competition. Regardless of whether samples came from beaver pond or from high-gradient or low-gradient reaches, aquatic Diptera nume...

متن کامل

Across the great divide: genetic forensics reveals misidentification of endangered cutthroat trout populations.

Accurate assessment of species identity is fundamental for conservation biology. Using molecular markers from the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes, we discovered that many putatively native populations of greenback cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii stomias) comprised another subspecies of cutthroat trout, Colorado River cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii pleuriticus). The error can be e...

متن کامل

Predation on native sculpin by exotic brown trout exceeds that by native cutthroat trout within a mountain watershed (Logan, UT, USA)

We explored potential negative effects of exotic brown trout (Salmo trutta) on native sculpin (Cottus sp.) on the Logan River, Utah, USA by (i) examining factors most strongly correlated with sculpin abundance (e.g., abiotic conditions or piscivory?), (ii) contrasting the extent of brown trout predation on sculpin with that by native cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii utah) and (iii) estimat...

متن کامل

Hybridization dynamics between Colorado's native cutthroat trout and introduced rainbow trout.

Newly formed hybrid populations provide an opportunity to examine the initial consequences of secondary contact between species and identify genetic patterns that may be important early in the evolution of hybrid inviability. Widespread introductions of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) into watersheds with native cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii) have resulted in hybridization. These in...

متن کامل

How High Can Brook Trout Jump? A Laboratory Evaluation of Brook Trout Jumping Performance

—Quantitative data on how high brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis can jump are crucial for efforts by fisheries managers to exclude brook trout from streams containing native cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkii subspp. and to build effective fishways for brook trout migration. We identified factors that could influence brook trout jumping ability and demonstrated how this knowledge could be app...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007